76report

c536d8910f

December 23, 2024
*|MC:SUBJECT|*

76report

December 23, 2024

Trump’s Top Economist Breaks with Convention in Pursuit of Real Growth

Donald Trump made a key announcement over the weekend when he tapped Stephen Miran to become Chair of the Council of Economic Advisers.


A Harvard Ph.D. who was mentored by Ronald Reagan’s own top economic adviser, Miran has extensive experience at both Treasury and in the private sector.


Miran may not (yet) be a household name, but he has articulated many unorthodox yet compelling positions on policy topics that are central to Trump’s economic agenda.


His priorities are growth, low inflation, reinvigorating American industry, national security, and technological innovation.


With the selection of Miran, who will work alongside Scott Bessent at Treasury and Howard Lutnick at Commerce, Trump is solidifying an economic team that will implement his growth-focused economic vision.


Like Reagan’s supply-side revolution, Trump’s economic gameplan breaks with conventional thinking in many respects. But the world has changed significantly and requires bold new ideas to sustain American economic dominance.


Created by Congress immediately after World War II to ensure the nation would not fall into another depression, the Council of Economic Advisers (CEA) was set up as an official executive agency.


While it perhaps offers less visibility than certain cabinet posts, the Chair of the Council is a critical position within the administration.


Consisting of three members appointed by the President, with the Chair requiring Senate confirmation, the CEA guides White House economic policy. The CEA works in close coordination with Treasury, which has more responsibility for execution.


Miran’s backstory


The choice of Miran is a stark contrast to the current Chair of the CEA, Jared Bernstein. Whereas Bernstein has degrees in Music and Social Work, Stephen Miran is an economist’s economist.


Bernstein’s inability to explain how Treasury bonds work will possibly go down in history as one of the most tragicomic moments of the Biden era. (It also led to one of our favorite YouTube segments.)

Jared’s Greatest Hits

Stephen Miran earned a Ph.D. in Economics from Harvard, where he studied under the legendary Martin Feldstein.


Feldstein, who passed away in 2019, was himself Chair of the Council of Economic Advisers from 1982 to 1984 under President Reagan. Considered one of the chief architects of the supply-side revolution, he advocated for tax cuts and budget discipline.

During the past two years, you have given me the benefit of your great knowledge and experience, and I want to thank you personally for the job you have done…. I know that you share my belief that we must return to the wisdom of the free market in determining the allocation of our nation's human and material resources. - Letter from Ronald Reagan to Martin Feldstein, accepting his resignation (May 9, 1984)

Miran served in the first Trump administration as an economic adviser in the Treasury department and worked on the pandemic response.


He is currently a senior strategist at the hedge fund Hudson Bay Capital Management as well as a fellow at the Manhattan Institute, a conservative think tank.


The Triffin dilemma


Perhaps the most interesting and differentiated aspect of Miran’s economic vision is his perspective on international trade.


In recent writings and interviews, Miran has spoken at length on tariffs, which he views as a solution to what economists call the Triffin dilemma.


In 1960, some eleven years before Nixon closed the gold window, Yale economist Robert Triffin published Gold and the Dollar Crisis. In this book, Triffin outlined a vulnerability inherent in the use of the dollar as the global reserve currency.


Triffin also accurately predicted the eventual collapse of the Bretton Woods system.


Triffin’s insights are as relevant today as they were fifty years ago.


The paradox Triffin identified is that if a nation is playing the role of provider of the global reserve currency, that nation is inevitably going to run trade deficits with the rest of the world.


For most nations, trade is always balanced because currency levels adjust.


As more of country A’s currency is used to import goods from country B, the value of country A’s currency tends to decline relative to the value of country B’s currency.


But when a country, like the United States, is the issuer of the global reserve currency, this adjustment mechanism is interrupted.


A reserve currency is, by definition, one that other countries keep in reserve as a medium of exchange for international trade.


Since World War II, the U.S. dollar has been the global reserve currency.

More than half of all international trade is now done in U.S. dollars along with some 90% of all financial transactions.


Because they need it to trade with other nations, foreign countries have a tendency to keep the U.S. dollars they receive when Americans buy their goods, rather than turn around and use those dollars to buy American goods.


The result is upward pressure on the dollar as the global reserve currency.


According to Miran, a persistently overvalued dollar has led to lower export demand for American manufactured goods and higher import demand flowing to foreign competitors.


Miran sees the hollowing out of American industry as a direct result of this dynamic Triffin identified decades ago.


Having the global reserve currency is not all bad, however.


Among the many benefits of being the reserve currency issuer are lower borrowing costs. Foreign countries need to buy your bonds to store your currency.


There is also the geopolitical benefit of “financial extraterritoriality,” as Miran has described it. This refers to the political and military influence associated with control over the global financial system.


Trump is keen to preserve “king dollar,” as reflected in his threat to tariff any participants in a potential new BRICS currency. The dollar-based system gives the U.S. economic power that is often more potent (and easier to wield) than military power.


Tariffs as a solution


When it comes to international trade, Miran is focused on finding ways for the U.S. to have its cake and eat it too.


He believes that with the right policies, the U.S. can continue to enjoy the benefits of being the global reserve currency, while not suffering the impacts on its industrial base.

From a trade perspective, the dollar is persistently overvalued, in large part because dollar assets function as the world’s reserve currency. This overvaluation has weighed heavily on the American manufacturing sector while benefiting financialized sectors of the economy in manners that benefit wealthy Americans…. [R]ather than attempting to end the use of the dollar as the global reserve currency, the Trump Administration can attempt to find ways to capture back some of the benefits other nations receive from our reserve provision. - Stephen Miran (11/2024)

The financial media and mainstream economists have attacked Trump’s proposed use of tariffs as inflationary and counterproductive.


Perhaps Miran’s greatest challenge will be to prove that tariffs are not only non-inflationary but can help the United States in multiple ways.


In a paper published just last month titled A User’s Guide to Restructuring the Global Trading System, Miran outlined his perspective on tariffs as a primary tool to offset the negative effects of having the global reserve currency.


Miran refers to empirical evidence that tariffs did not cause inflation during Trump’s first term. He points out that Core Personal Consumption Expenditure (PCE) growth, the Fed’s preferred inflation metric, was below the Fed’s 2% target for nearly all of Trump’s first term.


Miran also provides several compelling theoretical and technical explanations as to why tariffs should not be inflationary and why other economists have miscalculated the impact.


Among other points, Miran observes that three-quarters of the inflationary impact of tariffs on Chinese goods were offset by currency depreciation.


Growing without inflation


In various interviews, Miran has spoken at length how the U.S. can achieve non-inflationary economic growth.


Borrowing, spending and printing money can achieve inflationary economic growth, but this growth is illusory. This is what we saw during the Biden administration.


In periods of inflationary growth, asset prices can rise in nominal terms and perhaps even real (inflation-adjusted) terms. But wage earners without substantial assets suffer as goods and services become more expensive. To make matters worse, they get priced out of assets, like homes.


A major reason Trump won the election is the progress he made with younger voters. The Biden economy was especially painful for younger voters, who generally did not benefit from inflation-driven growth in the stock market and housing prices.


The combination of elevated house prices and high interest rates on mortgages has resulted in the dream of home ownership becoming totally out of reach for many young Americans. Kamala Harris likely paid a big price for this.


Managing the Treasury market


Markets are currently anxious that Trump’s growth plans will stimulate demand and drive up inflation.


Long-term treasury yields have crept up, which has been a headwind to the stock market in December, as we have discussed. Higher long-term interest rates are bad for stock valuations.


There is no question that Trump cares about the performance of stocks and views it as a barometer of success.


Arguably the key challenge for Trump’s new economic team will be to make the economy grow without driving up inflation expectations and long-term interest rates.


The fact that Trump chose Miran, who is very much focused on this issue, is an indication of just how crucial Trump believes it is to deliver growth in a non-inflationary manner.


Deregulation and innovation


Miran talks a lot about deregulation as a deflationary force. This relates to the supply side logic of his mentor Feldstein.


When it becomes more difficult, expensive and time-consuming to deliver goods and services, prices inevitably rise. The essence of deregulation is to make it easier, cheaper and faster for businesses to serve their customers.


The process of deregulation, such as expediting zoning permits, removes bottlenecks that slow down, complicate and distort economic activity.


Innovation is another key driver for a nation that wants to generate real economic growth. Innovation translates into productivity growth.


Productivity growth simply means producing more with less. It is inherently deflationary.


Miran has noted the enormous opportunity to leverage Artificial Intelligence (AI) to drive up productivity growth. He strongly supports industrial policy, like paving the way for expansion of the electric grid, that enables AI-related investments.


Miran has not spoken to our knowledge in tremendous detail about cryptocurrency, but what he has said has also been supportive. He views digital assets as a form of financial innovation that will reduce the cost of financial transactions and will stimulate business activity.


National security


Another dimension of Miran’s body of work is that he does not view economic policy in isolation. This is especially relevant given the importance of China as a major trading partner.


Tariffs function as a mechanism to protect the manufacturing sector from the overvaluation of the U.S. dollar that comes from it being the reserve currency.


But tariffs also function to preserve the ability of the U.S. to produce critical goods.


Just as Miran appreciates the value of having the global reserve currency from a geopolitical perspective, he gets that tariffs can be deployed in a way that prevents the disintegration of crucial domestic supply chains.  


Market-oriented


While Miran is highly trained economist, he has worked in the private sector. Like his future counterpart Scott Bessent at Treasury, he has displayed an understanding that markets need to be handled carefully.


One reassuring observation Miran has offered regarding tariffs is the idea that tariffs can be deployed incrementally. He understands that markets do not appreciate shocks, surprises and uncertainties.


The Trump economic team is breaking with past practice in many ways, which has the potential to make investors nervous. But the world is now a much different place from what it has ever been.


Trump has re-written the political playbook and produced a Republican coalition and policy agenda that is a stark contrast from past Republican administrations.


The same inventiveness is now being applied to his economic team and strategy.


Trump wants to do things differently, but he is proceeding carefully. He is making sure to surround himself with competent and proven individuals who have a deep understanding of how markets and the economy actually work.


Like his mentor Marty Feldstein, Stephen Miran is not terribly well-known to the general public, but he now has a great opportunity to help craft the policies that will deliver the golden age Trump has promised American voters.

Click HERE to learn more about our Model Portfolio subscription plans.

FOR SUBSCRIBER USE ONLY. DO NOT FORWARD OR SHARE.

This is an automated post