76report

b108b13aa4

March 29, 2024
*|MC:SUBJECT|*

76report

March 29, 2024

Where did Volcker 2.0 go?

Markets have rallied since the Fed meeting on Wednesday, March 20, which was widely interpreted as a dovish event. Low interest rates and inflation-driven earnings growth are a winning combination for most stocks.


Notwithstanding recent indications of building inflationary pressures, Fed Chair Jerome Powell appeared on course to initiate a series of rate cuts over the remainder of the year. The FOMC held overnight rates steady within a range of 5.25%-5.50%. The Fed Funds rate has not been changed since it was last increased by a quarter-point in July 2023.

The path from 0 to 5.25%

Three rates cuts remain priced into the widely tracked median “dot plot,” although relative to the last meeting, the median moved a notch closer to two.


In terms of understanding expectations, what may be most relevant is what the Treasury market is now directly telling us about near-term rate expectations. Based on FactSet’s interpolation of the yield curve, markets are saying there is more than a 75% chance that Fed Funds will be 0.75% (or more) lower by the mid-December 2024 Fed meeting.

Market-implied probabilities on Fed Funds

With January and February inflation prints coming in hotter than expected, there was some belief the Fed might take a more cautious position on future rate cuts. The Fed’s apparent willingness to brush off this data along with other inflation signals gives rise to speculation that Powell is doing what he can to keep the stock market buoyant heading into the November election.


Is Powell playing politics?


While Powell was originally nominated by Trump, he was renominated by Biden and is generally viewed as an establishment creature. He, like all past and future Fed officials, disavows any political motivations. It’s of course impossible to know what he’s truly thinking.


One possibility is that he simply wants to cling to the previously signaled course of action, just to appear politically unbiased. A change in direction with the election so close could be interpreted as a politically motivated maneuver, even if it is justified by the data.


Election year precedents


It’s interesting too look back at history and see how the Fed has behaved in election years. Over the last 40 years, the Democrat candidate has not won in any year in which the Fed was lifting rates.


This could be sheer coincidence, but if one had to speculate as to a causal relationship, a reasonable inference might be that the electorate veers to the party of big government in periods of economic uncertainty and weakness. Clinton won in ‘92 against the backdrop of a recession, Obama won in ‘08 as the financial crisis unfolded, and Biden won in ‘20 amidst Covid.


Although the Fed is now in a position of dropping rates, the context is totally different versus those three prior elections. In each of those years, the Fed was easing due to weakening economic conditions. In 2024, the Fed is easing as it attempts to bring rates down from unusually high levels as inflation normalizes.

Source: Federal Reserve Board

One of the more influential critics of the Fed in recent years has been the economist Larry Summers, the former Treasury Secretary under Bill Clinton. Summers was a rare voice within Democrat circles when he warned about the likely inflationary consequences of aggressive fiscal and monetary policy back in May 2021. At the time, the lower bound of the Fed Funds rate was still zero (and remarkably, in retrospect, would remain zero for another ten months).

The Fed’s idea used to be that it removed the punchbowl before the party got good. Now, the Fed’s doctrine is that it will only remove the punchbowl after it sees some people staggering around drunk. - Larry Summers, May 2021

When someone has correctly analyzed a situation in the past, it is logically worth keeping track of what they have to say. In a recent interview following the Fed meeting, Summers expressed concern that the Fed is once again being far too complacent. His interview with Bloomberg is worth watching.

Summers: Fed Still Has 'Itchy Fingers' to Start Cutting Rates

Larry Summers (3/22/2024)

Perhaps the most interesting part of Summers’ commentary was his thoughts on the neutral rate. Summers mentioned a wide range of factors which suggest, in his mind, that the neutral rate of interest is “far more likely to have a 4-handle” than to be something close to 2.6%, as the Fed is now indicating. These factors include low unemployment, persistently above target inflation rates, strong GDP growth and loose financial conditions.


As we discussed in Investing for Inflation Protection, there is strong case to be made that after 40 years of low and declining inflation, we are moving into an era of structurally higher inflation.


Summers identified several of the key points of the long-term inflation thesis, including:

  • Decarbonization: The world is undertaking enormous investments to transition from lower cost fossil fuel energy sources to higher cost (and less reliable) renewables. (We are not only moving to higher cost sources of energy, but the process of getting there consumes resources and capital.)

  • Electrification: As we mentioned in our discussion of Freeport McMoRan (FCX), major investments in the electrical infrastructure will be required to accommodate the AI boom.

  • Deglobalization: We are potentially in the process of unwinding the disinflationary benefit of several decades of relatively unrestricted trade with China.


Whether or not Powell and company are politically motivated, there are a lot of reasons to believe the Fed is prematurely planning its inflation victory party. The Fed badly misread the situation in 2021, which only exacerbated the inflation wave that peaked in June 2022, when the Consumer Price Index broke 9%. If the Fed now loosens financial conditions prematurely, we may not see quite the same intensity of a reaction, but this would only contribute to inflation rates staying higher for longer (on top of the structural drivers).


The Fed meeting last week has done nothing to discourage us from continuing to favor inflation-sensitive investments.

FOR SUBSCRIBER USE ONLY. DO NOT FORWARD OR SHARE.


This is an automated post