76report

35c80bb0d6

June 7, 2024
*|MC:SUBJECT|*

76report

June 7, 2024

Red states get their own stock exchange

The TXSE Group announced that it is has filed with the SEC to launch the Texas Stock Exchange, which will be a “national stock exchange” based in Dallas. TXSE Group is a recently formed entity that says it is sponsored by some two dozen investors, including various financial institutions and prominent individuals. The group has raised $120 million and named Citadel Securities and BlackRock among the “liquidity providers” who are backing the formation of the new exchange.


TXSE noted that these liquidity providers “together comprise a majority of all U.S. listed retail volume.” The company emphasized that it will be focusing on the “southeast quadrant” of the country, which it defines as Texas, Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina and Tennessee.


Each of the twelve named states supported Trump in the 2020 election, which gives this movement to create a Dallas-based exchange a clear political dimension.


The company has not said much more about its plans, although the venture seems to be differentiated by more than a regional focus. “Listing standards” were referenced in the press release.

Corporate issuers and exchange-traded product sponsors are demanding more stability and predictability around listing standards and associated costs. - TXSE Group

Economic CIVIL WAR: Red States Get a Stock Exchange

TXSE is poised to compete primarily against NYSE and Nasdaq, a duopoly that controls the vast majority of equity trading in the United States. In recent years, Nasdaq in particular has attracted attention for mandating “Diverse” board members among its listing requirements.

The company must have, or explain why it does not have, at least two members of its board of directors who are Diverse, including (i) at least one Diverse director who self identifies as Female; and (ii) at least one Diverse director who self-identifies as an Underrepresented Minority or LGBTQ+. Note that companies are eligible for phase-in periods and this rule is not fully effective until December 31, 2026. - Nasdaq, Initial Listing Guide, January 2024

While Nasdaq is proud to be “relentlessly reimagining the markets of today,” the diversity requirement is not universally appreciated. Many companies want to choose the best candidates for board seats, with emphasis on work experience and other skills. They don’t want to be coerced into choosing board members on the basis of their skin color or sexual preferences.


We suspect many companies in the southeast quadrant are particularly non-receptive to Nasdaq’s woke requirements.


Another post-ESG adaptation


As we have noted at some length, the ESG movement has normalized the application of left-wing political ideologies and priorities within the board room. This often unwelcome fusion of politics with commerce has produced a number of reactions in protest and has also created business opportunities.


Elon Musk bought Twitter to rectify what he perceived as government-led censorship. Strive Asset Management was formed by Vivek Ramaswamy to combat ESG’s prevalence on the money management side. Last but not least, 76research was created to address the investment research angle.


The beauty of free markets is that customers have a choice. The formation of TXSE is a natural extension of the ongoing pattern of new businesses springing up to meet market demand for politically neutral service providers.


The demise of public markets


In the case of the exchanges, the burdens of ESG, DEI and other social mandates have only exacerbated an even broader problem. The United States has become an environment that is arguably hostile to public listings.


The number of publicly traded companies in the United States has fallen by approximately half since a peak in the late 1990s. There are multiple reasons for this, including the development of the private equity industry and various burdens imposed on public companies since the 2002 Sarbanes-Oxley Act went into effect.


Businesses also now have opportunities to access capital from private investors in ways that were not available decades ago. Technology has clearly played a role. Technological advancements, such as electronic document services, have facilitated the formation of complicated private financing arrangements that used to require a platform (public exchanges). Almost anything these days can be accomplished with a laptop and an iPhone.


There is a parallel here to changes in the media sector. The internet has enabled content producers to access their audiences directly without centralized networks acting as referee. A stock exchange, like a cable news network, is a middleman that extracts fees, imposes rules and is in some cases unnecessary.


Given the potentially declining relevance of public markets, especially for smaller, early stage companies, financial institutions like BlackRock have a vested interest in doing what they can to reverse the trend. Businesses built around publicly traded instruments have a natural interest in promoting the health and growth of public markets.


Is BlackRock changing its stripes?


BlackRock was an early champion of ESG investing but has since shown signs of pivoting away from it. Our perspective, based on direct experience, has always been that ESG was a commercial strategy for most financial institutions.


The politicization of the investment process was seen as an opportunity to charge higher fees. The executives at these companies may or may not align ideologically with the core beliefs of the ESG movement, but in our experience these individuals tend to be mercenaries, not missionaries.


To the extent Wall Street’s embrace of ESG, DEI and other acronyms isn’t currently helping them, it’s not all that surprising that companies like BlackRock are moving in the other direction and aligning themselves with figures like anti-woke warrior Ken Griffin. It was always about the money.


Citadel founder Ken Griffin has been a very outspoken critic of America’s woke trajectory. It is no surprise that he is involved in this venture. Griffin is one of the most successful hedge fund managers in history, with a reported net worth of $30 billion, and is highly active in Republican politics. We suspect he is playing a very large role here. Griffin was raised in Boca Raton and famously relocated Citadel from Chicago to Florida, a key “southeast quadrant” state.

Citadel’s Griffin is backing the new exchange

Elements within conservative social media are alarmed by BlackRock’s involvement in this venture. Our read is that this is probably more about BlackRock continuing to back away from its ill-considered ideological commitments than Texas embracing BlackRock’s.  

FOR SUBSCRIBER USE ONLY. DO NOT FORWARD OR SHARE.



This is an automated post